I believe that even if the punishment is not harassment because it is not continued unwanted behavior, it breaks rule 6 for ruining player experiences. Scar finds enjoyment in pvping and Adm claiming the end island is an obvious personal attack against Scar's enjoyment and player experience. Scar tried to pvp in one of the few legal possible ways he could, the end. The fact that Adm admitted to claiming the end island in order to specifically target Scar also lends to the fact that this was indeed targeted at ruining the player experience of one player. Despite his good intentions, I believe Adm did indeed break this rule. There is no rule against pvping in the end thus far and Adm claiming the entire end island was taking his actions too far. Players are not staff. Leave it to the staff to handle and do not take matters into your own hands. While there is no rule against claiming the entire end island, I believe that claiming the entire island breaks the rule of common sense. There is no way that it would be common sense to allow any one player to claim the entire end island and have full access over its' land to do with it as they see fit. It has been repeatedly said, time and time again that players should wait for staff decisions and not take matters into their own hands and those who have taken matters into their own hands have always been punished for it. Will you treat this player any differently?