iiTzArismaltor_ Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 Hello, Today, I would like to help a bit here. A lot of players (including me) complain about the strength potions. They are tired of dying again and again by players that always buy strength and usually spawn kill as well. So, I have a suggestion. What if we decrease the ammount of the strength potions that a player can buy in each match? This way, spawn killing will be decreased and more players will be playing ctw. Have a nice day guys, thank you all so much for reading, peace out. Aris PS: I don't know if normal players are allowed to make polls too or if it is only for the staff members. btw, infinite* :v Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterIsIllegal Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 I think the price for normal users should be increased, and donators payed for their Strength II so I don't see any reason to take em' out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarceLOL Posted February 14, 2018 Share Posted February 14, 2018 I would delete strength II from the market and make strength I exclusive for donators, with a higher price (it's ridiculously cheap) Also remove sharpness, protection and power enchants. At least level III and IV Strength II is one hit kill...it makes no sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iiTzArismaltor_ Posted February 14, 2018 Author Share Posted February 14, 2018 MarceLOL is right. Sponsors and Sponsor+s take x3 coins, so there are many of them (e.g.: xJackComboMc_) who just spend a few coins for the strength and after that, they start spawn killing. :/ However, Mainblast is right too. They paid for strength II. What about 2 strength II and x strength I potions for S(+)? (x=the result of the poll. .e.g.: if x=2, then the S(+) will be able to buy 2 Strength II and 2 Strength I potions in each match) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterIsIllegal Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 I don't want 1min matches, I want long matches, where did you invent that from @RIP 7w7? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jiimmy_04 Posted February 15, 2018 Share Posted February 15, 2018 On 14/02/2018 at 21:46, MarceLOL said: I would delete strength II from the market and make strength I exclusive for donators, with a higher price (it's ridiculously cheap) Also remove sharpness, protection and power enchants. At least level III and IV +1! Pretty good idea! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iiTzArismaltor_ Posted April 4, 2018 Author Share Posted April 4, 2018 Hello. Can I somehow change my vote? I want 0 strength potions for unranked players. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 4, 2018 Share Posted April 4, 2018 Edited: All kits shall stay. This topic shall be closed! -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David2061 Posted April 29, 2018 Share Posted April 29, 2018 In my opinion kits shall stay :). -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MeJorge Posted April 30, 2018 Share Posted April 30, 2018 I think the most op stuff is the worst, becouse even if you dont have, you can kill someone with pot, but unless you use something really op, you can't kill someone with notch and full diamond enchanted. It's boring when someone uses full diamond and notch to do spawnkill and you can't report him/her becouse his team gets the wools and they place them so they don't spend much time there. Actually i think it's a reason why most ctw players left the server. People using enders with notch are really annoying and i know they paied for that but other players want to play normaly. But i agree that maybe they should increase the price for the strenght potion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HowYouLikeThatBP Posted May 2, 2018 Share Posted May 2, 2018 bad idea marce lol, ctw is already close to being a hardcore cubecraft eggwars game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PerfectNeo Posted May 2, 2018 Share Posted May 2, 2018 I don't think it's necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telis. Posted May 2, 2018 Share Posted May 2, 2018 I do not think it is necessary either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iiTzArismaltor_ Posted May 2, 2018 Author Share Posted May 2, 2018 Then, what about increasing the price of it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarceLOL Posted May 2, 2018 Share Posted May 2, 2018 What are you talking about Ray, eggwars is a new minigame which does nothing to do with ctw. I really give up about trying to change CTW. But Craftersland's ctw is not ctw. You can call it broken ctw if you want, that's a proper name, yeah. Or better, there's "Pure" Survival right?, so ctw would be Pure Kit. New minigame guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Telis. Posted May 2, 2018 Share Posted May 2, 2018 2 hours ago, MarceLOL said: What are you talking about Ray, eggwars is a new minigame which does nothing to do with ctw. I really give up about trying to change CTW. But Craftersland's ctw is not ctw. You can call it broken ctw if you want, that's a proper name, yeah. Or better, there's "Pure" Survival right?, so ctw would be Pure Kit. New minigame guys :v Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 2, 2018 Share Posted June 2, 2018 Well, I changed my opinion. The kits should stay as donors paid for them. If there will be people raging, then it is their problem, not ours. -1 On 29.04.2018 at 14:07, David2061 said: In my opinion kits shall stay :). -1 x2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WaterIsIllegal Posted June 3, 2018 Share Posted June 3, 2018 Don't bump old topics, this has been ignored for a while now (1 month) as most of them... T/C. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.