Jump to content

Henk

Administrator
  • Content Count

    2,621
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    154

Henk last won the day on June 28

Henk had the most liked content!

About Henk

  • Rank
    Community Manager
  • Birthday 07/04/1995

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Sweden
  • Interests
    DeluxeMenus and Helpchat <3

Recent Profile Visitors

15,176 profile views
  1. Topic moved to rev tech support According to buycraft, however, you have received what you purchased: If there was another purchase that wasn't under your name, we will need information in order to find it, time stamp, name you used, transcation ID, etc.
  2. The Wand of Animation has been a hot debate ever since we launched the server. We, the server managers, decided to limit the usage of the Wand of Animation to be blacklisted inside the Mob Duplicator due to the duplicative nature of this item. For those that have never heard of either of these items or simply have no idea what I'm talking about - With this wand you are able to "animate" blocks, turning them into entities. If you then capture that mob in a Mob Imprisonment Tool you are then able to spawn them repeatedly with little to no cost. It's also worth pointing out the mob also drops the block when you kill it. The question of "lag" also arose when discussing this item- as relatively large setups needs to be built in order continuously spawn in these mobs. Some argue that it's less lag than the alternative, but for some bizarre reason, with this version of Minecraft and with sponge, mob entities are usually the laggiest chunks on the server. 10-15 mobs outweigh hundreds of machines. That's pretty crazy. But because players have been really persistent about wanting this item to work fully, I have decided that we are going to give it a try. For a short while this item will be removed from the blacklist on the Mob Duplicator. The point of this is to run a test to see if it's viable for server performance to have this item unbanned, and the idea is to run this test for 7+ days, but if it comes to it being ridiculously laggy then we may cancel the test early. This however, comes with it's own restrictions and a few things you should know if you plan on using it: Items gained from using the Wand of Animation, as well as EMC gathered from the Wand of Animation, is not allowed to be sold, traded or given to other players. This will count as an offense against Rule 4. Don't go overboard. The point of this test is to see if we can really have it unrestricted, if you, yourself, lag out the server with the mindset of "It's only unbanned for a few days, I gotta get the most out of it!" you are not only hurting yourself but also the playerbase. A few disclaimers- We reserve the right to limit the functionality of the animated blocks, when it comes to spawn rates, drop chances, etc. But for now it's all default. If staff find setups that cause unnecessary lag on the server they have the right to demand you to either turn the setup off or tear it down. If you are not compliant or unreachable, either or those things may be done for you, with no option for a Refund Request. And in extreme cases it can be punishable according to Rule 12
  3. Henk

    I have a question

    That’s more of the case with Texturepacks, I don’t think that’s possible with mods, if it is I would be very curious in it
  4. Henk

    I have a question

    Forge is just the API that let’s mods do what they do, without forge, mods don’t work. And without mods, forge is just an empty shell. So the answer to your question is, yes, tou need to install the RLCraft modpack, having forge by itself is not enough
  5. Hello, Sorry, but only staff have the ability to spawn in items without tags that can be used for refunds. For staff it is common practice not to refund directly ingame as we require a refund request on the forum in order to do one, as it acts as a public record for the refunds you have requested and if someone were to abuse said system it is very easy for us to follow the breadcrumbs. This, and the fact that it forces the player to make a defined list of items lost instead of just listing things off the top of their heads, that also helps combat abuse. I don’t see that you have any active refund request, so is it possible you mistook our common practice for them being busy? Nevertheless, it is just one post away and staff will get to it when there’s time. Make a new post in this section: https://forum.craftersland.net/forum/363-technical-support/ And follow this template: Thanks!
  6. PDB

    hi, how do i play towny?

  7. Henk I want to apologize for what happened in discord, I am very sorry but i have to talk this.

    he staff southrumble80 and Fermin

     

    They are reducing players bans just because they accept and reveal that they violate the rules, regardless of wether it is a ban on illegal items, that is breaking the rules, unlike other players who accept their mistakes, they are punished with due punishment, is this the new staff??,, this is unfair to the other players who have been banned.

    In the rules it does not say that the staff can reduce the ban of a player to their will, something illegal is something illegal, the rules are already in place and it is paid as it should be.

    The staff does not rule so you can not do something as you want

    I demand that you begin to punish the way it should be ,, I don't understand why they reduce the ban to dup materials if that was what damaged the server
    The staff told me that "each staff reduces the time they see fit"

    1. Show previous comments  2 more
    2. SuarezMC

      SuarezMC

      Henk, that was not a mistake, they knew what they were doing, especially the soth player, he told me that each staff reduces the amount of time they want 

      Prueba 1.png

    3. SuarezMC
    4. SuarezMC

      SuarezMC

      I asked the player: do you remember the south saying: "the staff punish as they want and reduce the amount of time they want"? ,,, the player answers me: yes, why ?, the other active players at that moment are witnesses

  8. Introducing... Of course everybody has heard of the Temple of Couatl, better known as the Temple of Fortunes. It is said the native residents of the jungle build the temple to pray and make offerings to their god, Couatl. For long it's been nothing more than a myth, many adventurers have been looking for it over the ages but always returned empty-handed, if they returned at all. That is, until recently... After years of hard work and effort an unknown explorer and his crew dedicated to finding the temple finally succeeded. They managed to clear a path to the front of the temple, but the trees were too dense to progress any further into the jungle. The natives were known for their cunningness and tales are told of the temple still holding riches... Perhaps it's worth to give it a look? We present you... THE TEMPLE OF COUATL! This marks the opening of the new area Temple of Couatl, featuring one main dungeon with an additional three parkours and dungeons. You will find the temple far north-east, on the outskirts of Glaskerville. Happy treasure hunting! Credits: @flamefurno - Temple, parkours and jungle @Slendy - Temple and Parkours @ZengZ - Temple
  9. It was actually working as intended, but with some VPN hopping they got past that. There's not a whole lot to do when offering a free package like this to prevent people from doing this, but I further limited it so it can now only be done once per IP and once per username every 12 hours. Should be less annoying.
  10. That's not really the problem, if we wanted to do this we would build a plugin around it rather than actually using the whitelist. Like, you would be similarly like not having /registered or /login'd had you not verified. But it's an interesting idea, and I understand your thought, making it an inconvenience for the one there to do harm, and while for every other player it's a piece of cake, as they already have a forum and can verify instantly. Well, that's unfortunately not the case, far from all of our players have a forum account so having a system like this would not only cause an inconvenience for the person with ill intent, but also our players. Especially much so if they need to wait for manual confirmation from staff. This would cripple our influx of new players to the server, and that is crucial for a healthy server. I like your ide and it's thinking outside the box, but I don't think this is a iteration that we can go with, I'm afraid.
  11. Granted. Keep in mind not to do large worldedits that lag the server, or you run a risk of losing your permissions and the ability to request commands.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Guidelines.